Peter O'Toole

Head of Imaging and Cytometry
University of York

"FOR AN IMAGING SCIENTIST QUITE OFTEN THEIR PASSION IS THE TECHNOLOGY AND APPLYING THAT TO AS MANY PEOPLE OR AS MANY ASPECTS AS POSSIBLE AND GETTING THE MAXIMUM IMPACT. THAT’S WHAT MAKES A GOOD IMAGING SCIENTIST."

Career path image

Career Path

I've been at York for just over 15 years, and I've been in the role as Director of the whole facility for coming up to two years in the Spring. I'm not one of these dyed in the wool microscopists that loved microscopes as a kid. Actually, I loathed them. The technologies we had at school even at university undergraduate level were shockingly bad which meant I could never focus anything and didn't understand it. However, through my PhD, I had to use a microscope and fell in love with the fact I could use it. I could pimp it, operate it and take it to another level that others weren't doing and that's when I got my buzz for it. There's an inspirational course at EMBL, an EMBO funded course I was lucky to get on, and that changed my life. I realised a career in facilities and technology, driving technology and providing that to others.

Learn more about careers in Imaging
Recognition image

Recognition

We have probably got 180 different uses of the microscope alone, and we get co-authored maybe once every five years on a microscopy paper. Sometimes we put in significant input, and maybe we should have [got co-authorship].

However, does it matter? For this type of role, I don't feel as though we should be judged by publications ourselves. It's the publications of our users that matter to the department. They're the ones who are usually Ref returnable. They're the ones delivering the impact. Our emphasis is to make sure they get the best impact. So if we can increase the impact of a number of publications that's our primary job.

Learn more about Recognition of Imaging Science
Technology image

Technology

If I don't have a big enough user base we can't invest in technology which is only going to benefit a few - and financially that's going to kill me. Other times, where you see a technology and think that users will really grab it - you then start to do the bidding process. Ultimately you have to get all the academics on-side, without the academics, without the proof that it's going to deliver impact to their science then we don't bid.

Learn the importance of Imaging Scientists to Technology
Team Science image

Team Science

I think interdisciplinary research needs very critical expertise in the other sciences and you don't always have that on your doorstep. So quite often we also have to go outside of York to find the best collaborators who can best fill that gap.  We had a collaboration with The Crick and Lucy Collinson. She has expertise far beyond mine but bringing that in was a huge asset.

 
Learn the benefits of Team Science
Finance image

Funding

One of the key things is when a user comes in, and they're excited about something they've just seen or done because either we've helped them do it or my staff have enabled them to do it. When they make an effort to come into the office to say 'this is amazing'. That's a real buzz.

There are two sides to this role. When you look at the budget sheet, and you know you're going to make the end of your finances comfortably and you have something spare to play with, that's also a bonus. You can't separate the two. You have to have financial responsibility as well as the excitement.

Learn more about Funding in Imaging Science
Rating

Rate in importance -
Funding / Publication / Technology

You have to start with the technology because without technology no one's going to bring the money in and no one's going to get the papers. Once you've got the technology, you have to get the financing. Technology to the finances through to the publications.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION #IMAGINGSCIENTIST

Meet the scientists